Cables From The Diplomatic Frontlines - Niger coup: fallout, national interests, and US policy options.
Niger’s coup matters more
More than the previous West African coups.
This is because 1) ECOWAS has threatened military action, and its (and mainly Nigeria’s) credibility is on the line, 2) Niger now has backing of two other neighboring and coup-flipped African states (Burkina Faso and Mali), and 3) Wider, and even global implications are much more significant this time around: jihadism is on the rise, another huge refugee crisis may take place, and outside interests (like Russia/Wagner) are involved - and this is happening at the time of an ongoing, and largest scale post-WWII European war.
There are of course unique proximate reasons for this coup: we don’t know the precise temptations and balance of incentives/disincentives that were facing the coup leader General Abdourahamane Tchiani when deciding to remove Niger’s democratically elected President Mohamed Bazoum.
As a facade for legitimacy, Tchiani claims that he will do a better job at defending Niger from jihadist insurgents.
But, on a personal level, and as an agent conducting this coup, Tchinai was as motivated by personal incentives - as any other coup leaders before him.
However, and regardless of precise motivations, the opportunity was there for him to take.
As such, on a grander level, the root cause of this coup is all too familiar: weak state institutions, and a tenuous civilian grip on the power structures.
Now, President Bazoum has done a decent job at governing the country since coming to power in 2021: economy has improved, modernized special units were formed to fight jihadists (with US investment and training), and Bazoum did a pretty good job at brokering ceasefire between rival power factions.
But, (and this is a good reminder for the policymakers in the US) the first order of business is to secure the resilience and security of a democratic government.
The US invested approximately $500mln into campaigns against Jihadists, and into training new units from Niger.
But, clearly, the formation of units in charge of protecting the democratically elected President and securing his rule was not a priority…
And nor did it matter that many of the establishment generals were closely mentored in the US.
In fact, one of the coup leaders was Brigadier General Moussa Barmou - an officer (apparently, one who was extremely popular with the US officials) who had attended the National Defense University in Washington and has dined with American officers at his home
(side note: just like Putin is investing heavily into strengthening a National Guard personally loyal to him/in charge of protecting the Kremlin, other democratic African states (and their Western backers) must take a page from this playbook - first order of business is to coup-proof a civilian government)
Now then, situation is tense and the union of West African states - ECOWAS (led by Nigeria) had previously issued an ultimatum with a threat of direct military intervention and use of force to restore democratic government if the coup leaders didn’t backtrack and the coup itself was not reversed by last Sunday.
That deadline has passed, and the coup leaders have not only refused to restore previous constitutional order, but have in fact announced their intent to resist any external military intervention.
Add to that, Mali and Burkina Faso have declared that they would see any use of force by ECOWAS as an attack on themselves as well.
(side note: and this is rational - for if ECOWAS was to succeed in Niger, appetites for a region-wide restoration of legitimate political order would surely grow, and Mali/Burkina Faso could end up being next on the list)
Although the deadline has passed, ECOWAS is yet to make a move - their credibility is now on the line.
The union will meet on Thursday to discuss the next steps - but they are clearly biding for time.
The reality is that none of the ECOWAS states are in position to invade Niger.
There is a huge capability-rhetoric mismatch.
Nigeria itself can barely contain its own jihadist insurgency - Boko Haram.
As an invading force, the country would need to expend significant resources to maintain any offensive advantage.
In addition, there have not been any significant reallocation/movement of forces within Nigeria.
There are no satellite images/open source intel (OSINT) indicating that Nigeria or any other ECOWAS state has taken any serious steps to fulfill their threats.
And leaders in Niger are of course aware of these lack of ‘‘honest signal’’ indicators too - hence why it was easy for them to call this bluff.
Regional and global interests and implications.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to The Bismarck Cables to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.